The Texas Center for Voucher Transparency logo is the initials of the center to the left of a purple Texas icon. To the right of the Texas icon is a red vertical line followed by the name of the center.

The Texas Center for Voucher Transparency (TXCVT) is an independent, nonpartisan public resource that supports transparency, fiscal responsibility, and fairness in the implementation of the $1 billion taxpayer-funded Texas Education Freedom Accounts (TEFA) voucher program.

Our goal is simple: To uphold the public trust and ensure that Texans have timely, credible information about how the voucher program operates, who it benefits, and how it affects public schools and communities.

No matter where you live or who you vote for, most Texans can agree on three principles when it comes to spending taxpayer dollars.

Good public policy should be clear and easy to understand and evaluate. The Texas Center for Voucher Transparency will conduct research and analyze data to provide Texans with timely, accurate, and usable information about the state’s voucher program, including whether the stated goal of the program is being met and who is – and is not – benefiting from the program. One of the most important questions to answer is whether the voucher program will primarily subsidize students already enrolled in private schools or home schools, as has happened in other states.

Texans believe in government efficiency. The TXCVT will monitor Texas’ voucher program to detect trends and flag any potential misuses of public funds. We know from watching other states what can happen when voucher programs are allowed to grow without guardrails and adequate oversight: budget deficits, misuse of public funds, and limited improvement in student outcomes.

Texas promises every Texan access to “an efficient system of public free schools.” Fairness means that one group of Texans shouldn’t benefit at the expense of others. Regardless of your position on vouchers, Texans deserve to know how voucher dollars are distributed across the state and how this impacts rural communities, special education services, public school district budgets and student outcomes.

Featured Research

Choice on Paper, Not on Practice

“Nearly 25,000 families have already opted out of the voucher program, and many have publicly shared that they declined the funding after facing multiple barriers trying to enroll in a voucher-accepting private school. This new report provides evidence of the complex private school landscape that voucher recipients are trying to navigate – one in which private schools choose their students through overlapping religious, financial, informational, and admissions requirements,” said Dee Carney, Director of the Texas Center for Voucher Transparency.

Read our review of 221 voucher-accepting private schools, which finds that access to private education is often shaped by a complex, multi-step application process with barriers including a narrow set of options for older students, selective admission requirements such as religious affiliation, lack of special education services, total cost of attendance, and lack of publicly-available information.

Taxpayer-funded private school vouchers and market failure: A policy scan and review from 1869 to 2024

A 2025 article published in the Education Policy Analysis Archives reviewed and analyzed state voucher policies from 1869 to 2024. The authors found little evidence that private school vouchers created markets with valued educational outcomes, and in many cases vouchers were used as a tool to maintain racial segregation. The report concludes that vouchers have not improved the quality of education, and in many cases, harm children and communities.

A screenshot of the title page from Taxpayer-Funded Private School Vouchers and Market Failure: A Policy Scan and Review from 1869 to 2024.

Standard Empirical Policy Analysis Does Not Support Universal Vouchers/ESAs

“I think these [voucher] programs are the biggest change in K-12 education since Brown v. Board of Ed,” said Douglas Harris, a scholar at Tulane who recently published two papers on the impact of universal private school choice programs. He argues that vouchers were originally introduced in the 1950s in part to resist desegregation by funding white families to attend private schools.

According to his October 2025 paper, private school choice “allows schools to discriminate against certain students, entwines government with religion, involves a large fiscal cost, and has shown fairly poor, or at best inconclusive, academic results.” Harris said in an interview, “It changes fundamentally all the basic traditions of the education system.”